18 Things Highly Creative People Do Differently

18 Things Highly Creative People Do Differently

Creativity isn't a right-brain trait — and that's good news. A 2013 neuroimaging study in PLoS ONE, analysing resting-state fMRI data from 1,011 individuals, found no evidence of a whole-brain "left-brained" or "right-brained" personality phenotype. Hemispheric lateralisation is real but local — no individual consistently shows the dominant global personality style the popular myth requires. The "right brain = creative" idea has no neurological basis.

What researchers who actually study highly creative people — Dean Simonton, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Scott Barry Kaufman — consistently find is something more useful: creativity is largely a set of learnable behaviours. Not a fixed endowment, not a personality type. A set of habits, most of them unglamorous, that reliably produce creative output. They're learnable regardless of temperament.

1. They work every day, not when inspired

Inspiration is a reward for showing up, not a prerequisite for it. Writers, painters, and scientists with sustained output almost all have a daily, unglamorous routine that begins independent of whether inspiration is present. K. Anders Ericsson's study in Psychological Review (APA, 1993) found that expert performance in music, chess, and sport was predicted by accumulated hours of deliberate practice more reliably than innate talent. Creative mastery follows the same logic: the daily practice produces the skill that eventually produces the inspired work.

2. They take long walks

Walking reliably enhances creative output. A meta-analysis of 117 studies in Psychological Bulletin (APA, 2009) found that incubation breaks — stepping away from a problem before returning — produced a mean effect of d = 0.65 on divergent thinking tasks, particularly when the break involved low-demand activity. The mechanism is the relaxation of focused attentional control, which allows associative thinking to surface. A walk is a near-perfect incubation activity.

3. They keep a capture system

A notebook, a phone-notes habit, or a dedicated app — always something to preserve the fragile half-formed thought the moment it shows up. Creative insight arrives when it isn't expected and is forgotten quickly when not immediately noted. The capture system is the infrastructure that prevents loss of the raw material that later becomes the work. The system doesn't need to be organised — classification can happen later; the idea that didn't get written down is gone.

4. They read outside their field

Novel combinations happen at the edges between disciplines. The most generatively creative people read, watch, and listen well outside their area of specialism. A person who knows only their own field has access only to the combinations that field has already explored. Cross-domain reading surfaces concepts, structures, and solutions that have worked in one context and haven't been applied to another.

5. They protect long stretches of unscheduled time

Creative work requires cognitive slack — space not allocated to meetings, messages, or deliverables. Analysis of over 9,000 daily diary entries from 177 professionals over seven years, published in Harvard Business Review (2002), found that extreme time pressure suppressed creativity in the majority of workers; exceptions occurred only when individuals felt they were on a focused mission rather than a reactive treadmill. A study in the Journal of Applied Psychology (APA, 2006) confirmed the relationship is curvilinear: moderate pressure helps only people high in openness to experience with organisational support for creativity. For most workers, any increase in pressure reduces output. Protecting unscheduled blocks is a structural requirement, not a luxury.

6. They let themselves be bored

Boredom is where the mind surfaces what it's actually trying to say. When attention has no external target, the default mode network — associated with mind-wandering — becomes active, and neuroimaging research has linked this network to creative ideation. A phone removes boredom instantly, and with it much of the mental incubation that produces creative output.

7. They sleep enough

REM sleep is the brain's overnight associative editor, replaying and recombining experience in ways specifically associated with creative insight. A 2003 study in Sleep (Oxford Academic) found that restricting sleep to six hours per night for two weeks produced cognitive deficits equivalent to two full nights of total sleep deprivation — and participants were largely unaware of their impairment. Chronic under-sleepers are working in a degraded creative state that is invisible to them.

8. They seek out constraints

Unlimited choice is a creativity killer. "Write a sonnet" produces more interesting work than "write a poem"; "one-minute song" beats "any song." Adding artificial constraints on purpose — a word limit, a colour palette, a time window — forces navigation through a defined problem space and surfaces solutions that open-ended prompts do not.

9. They finish things

Starting is easy; finishing is where creativity actually lives. Most failed creative lives are failed finishing lives — the discipline of completing what was started, rather than abandoning it for the next exciting beginning, is where revision, choice, and the actual work of making something good happens.

10. They share early work

Showing something imperfect to one trusted person beats waiting for something polished and never showing it. Early feedback — before the work is emotionally over-invested — is more usable and less threatening than feedback on work you believe to be finished.

11. They keep a bad-ideas folder

Writing down the first ten ideas — knowing they will mostly be bad — is often what clears the way for the eleventh. The internal editing that prevents bad ideas from being written down also prevents many good ones from emerging, because filtering happens before the idea is fully formed. Separating generation from evaluation — dumping first, judging later — is one of the most reliable techniques in the divergent thinking literature.

12. They ask "what if the opposite were true?"

Reversal is the single most underrated creative technique. Taking any assumption in the current approach and inverting it opens paths that confirm-the-existing-logic thinking cannot. Applied to any problem, design, or premise, it reliably surfaces framings that were invisible while the original assumption was treated as settled.

13. They keep strange hobbies

Research on creative individuals — including biographical and interview studies by Csikszentmihalyi and colleagues — consistently finds that many have at least one hobby with no surface connection to their main work: cooking, gardening, music, chess. The hobby feeds the main work through mechanisms that aren't immediately obvious: attention to craft, tolerance for failure and iteration, and the renewal of observational acuity that comes from being a beginner in a different domain.

14. They have a reliable "first move"

Every creative session starts with the same low-friction ritual — a warmup sketch, a freewrite, three scales on the piano — that moves from not-working to working without requiring motivation in the moment. The ritual is a cue that activates the work-state; over weeks, starting the ritual produces the state change before the actual creative work begins.

15. They don't wait for big ideas

Big ideas are almost always compounded small ones. Chasing small ideas ruthlessly — the minor observation, the small experiment, the modest refinement — is the actual mechanism through which most major creative work develops.

16. They embrace not-knowing

Premature certainty closes creative paths that uncertainty leaves open. Highly creative practitioners sustain the uncertain, exploratory state for longer than most people are comfortable doing — and that is precisely where most original work hides.

17. They love their first drafts anyway

First drafts are supposed to be bad. This is a structural feature of the creative process, not a failure. The first draft is a thinking tool, not a product. Creative practitioners who understand this write it freely and revise later; those who don't often cannot write the first draft at all, because they are trying to write a final draft the first time through.

18. They take breaks before they're tired

The research on incubation breaks (Psychological Bulletin, APA, 2009 — 117 studies, mean effect d = 0.65) confirms that stepping away from a problem before exhaustion, not after it, produces the insight that sustained focused effort misses. Scheduling breaks before the energy dips preserves the associative slack that is the actual medium of creative thought. A related finding: a study in Thinking & Reasoning (Taylor & Francis, 2011) found that evening-type individuals performed better on insight problems during their non-optimal morning hours — when reduced inhibitory control loosened associative thinking. Peak alertness is not always the right state for creative work.

How to start

Pick three of these. Do them for thirty days. Notice which one moves the needle most, keep it, and add another. Creativity compounds in stacked habits, not in leaps. For the broader set of ways to support creative thinking, the seven most reliable creativity-boosting habits is a direct companion. The underlying attentional capacity that creative work draws on is also developed through consistent meditation practice, which specifically trains the ability to direct and sustain attention.

Frequently asked questions

Is creativity a right-brain trait that some people are born with?

No. A 2013 neuroimaging study in PLoS ONE, analysing resting-state fMRI data from 1,011 people, found no evidence of a whole-brain 'left-brained' or 'right-brained' personality phenotype. Hemispheric lateralisation is real but local — specific networks are lateralised, not whole personality styles. The 'right brain = creative' idea is a popular myth without neurological basis. What the research on creative practitioners (Dean Simonton, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Scott Barry Kaufman) consistently finds instead is that creativity is substantially a set of practised behaviours — daily work habits, incubation practices, and cross-domain reading — that are learnable regardless of personality type.

Does time pressure help or hurt creativity?

Mostly hurts it. Analysis of over 9,000 daily diary entries from 177 professionals, published in Harvard Business Review (2002), found that extreme time pressure suppressed creativity in the majority of workers. A study in the Journal of Applied Psychology (APA, 2006) found the relationship is curvilinear: moderate pressure can help people high in openness to experience who have organisational support for creativity, but for most people any increase in pressure reduces creative output. Protecting unscheduled time is a structural requirement for sustained creative work, not a luxury. See 9 techniques for self-improvement and growth for the broader time and focus system.

Do breaks actually improve creative thinking?

Yes, reliably. A meta-analysis of 117 studies published in Psychological Bulletin (APA, 2009) found that incubation breaks — stepping away from a problem and returning later — enhanced creative problem-solving with a mean effect size of d = 0.65 on divergent thinking tasks. The benefit was strongest when the break preceded re-engagement (not after exhaustion set in) and when the interpolated activity was low-demand (like a walk, rather than another cognitively demanding task). The mechanism is the relaxation of focused attentional control, which allows loose associative thinking to surface ideas that sustained concentrated effort misses.

What is the best time of day for creative work?

It depends on your chronotype. Most analytical tasks benefit from peak alertness. But a study in Thinking & Reasoning (Taylor & Francis, 2011) found that evening-type individuals actually performed better on insight (creative) problems during their non-optimal morning hours — when reduced inhibitory control loosened associative thinking. For creative work specifically, the slightly unfocused, not-fully-alert state may be more productive than peak sharpness for some people. The practical advice: experiment with both peak and off-peak windows for different creative tasks, and track which produces better work rather than assuming peak alertness always wins.

Sources

  1. Time of day effects on problem solving: When the non-optimal is optimal — Thinking & Reasoning (2011)
  2. The Curvilinear Relation Between Experienced Creative Time Pressure and Creativity: Moderating Effects of Openness to Experience and Support for Creativity — Journal of Applied Psychology (2006)
  3. Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance: A Meta-Analysis — Psychological Bulletin (1998)
  4. The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance — Psychological Review (1993)
  5. Does Incubation Enhance Problem Solving? A Meta-Analytic Review — Psychological Bulletin (2009)

Comments (0)

Leave a Comment